Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125177›Full record

ReviewThe journal of climate change and health

The health co-benefits and costs of climate adaptation interventions: A rapid scoping review and implications for policy and practice.

Annabelle Workman, Sophie Cullen, Hasini Gunasiri, Elise Moo, Vanora Mulvenna, Rohani Savage, Fran MacDonald, Kathryn J Bowen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annabelle WorkmanMelbourne Climate Futures, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Sophie CullenMelbourne Climate Futures, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Hasini GunasiriMelbourne Climate Futures, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Elise MooMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Bouverie Street, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Vanora MulvennaOffice of the Chief Health Officer, Community and Public Health Division, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Rohani SavageOffice of the Chief Health Officer, Community and Public Health Division, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Fran MacDonaldWestern Alliance for Greenhouse Action, Sunshine, 3020, Australia.
Kathryn J BowenMelbourne Climate Futures, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Climate change is the biggest health threat of the 21st century, with health outcomes worsening across most climate-sensitive health parameters. The World Health Organization's 2025 Global Action Plan on Climate Change and Health calls for health and climate issues to be better integrated in policy development as a matter of priority. Recent research indicates that climate adaptation interventions present an opportunity for substantial returns on investment when health and other outcomes are accounted for. This rapid scoping review explores a subset of the broader peer-reviewed literature assessing health co-benefits and costs of climate adaptation interventions. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE was carried out in August 2024 and 286 papers were screened for eligibility. 25 papers were deemed eligible for inclusion and data were extracted across multiple variables, including geographic location of study, reported cost of intervention, health outcomes and reported indicators. Results: Most of the 25 included papers were review articles and did not quantify or monetize health co-benefits. Only two of the 25 included papers reported the cost of featured climate adaptation interventions. A quarter of the included papers discussed potentially relevant indicators for reporting adaptation health co-benefits. Nature-based solutions and interventions relating to the built environment were the most common sectors covered. Conclusion: Recognizing the limitations of our findings given the subset of papers included in this scoping review, there appears to be an opportunity within the peer-reviewed literature to quantify the health co-benefits of climate adaptation interventions, report on their costs and benefits, and use standardized intervention typologies or measurement frameworks to assess effectiveness. Beyond the need for a more comprehensive and systematic review, future research must better evaluate the effectiveness and health outcomes of climate adaptation interventions and planning through appropriate study designs to enable evidence-based policy decisions that optimize the benefits of adaptation action.

Indexed as

AdaptationClimate changeHealth co-benefitsPolicy

Identifiers

PMID42125177
PMCPMC13158384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.