ArticleClinical case reports2026
Obturator Dislocations Following Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Two Case Reports With Analysis of Implant and Spinopelvic Factors.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dislocation remains a potential complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), even with the anterior approach, which is generally associated with lower instability rates. Obturator dislocation, although well-documented in native hips following high-energy trauma, is extremely rare in the context of THA and has not been previously described in patients with preoperative spinopelvic assessment. We report two cases of obturator dislocation following direct anterior approach THA in young female patients without medical comorbidities. Both dislocations occurred during extreme hip flexion combined with abduction and external rotation. In one case, closed reduction attempts initially failed, requiring reduction on a traction table. Radiographic and 3D analyses revealed shared features, including significant medialization of the acetabular component (10 mm), low combined anteversion (16° and 24°), and lumbopelvic mobility patterns dominated by hip flexion. Preoperative functional imaging showed no signs of spinopelvic imbalance or stiffness. Both patients exhibited a "hip user" profile with low pelvic incidence and distal lumbar lordosis apex. These cases highlight multiple converging factors contributing to instability: loss of offset due to cup medialization, stem retroversion resulting in low combined anteversion, and postoperative increase in compensatory hip flexion. Notably, no classic spinopelvic risk factors were present. These findings underscore the need for precise implant positioning, especially for acetabular positioning and femoral version.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.