ArticleHealth policy OPEN2026
Developing a framework for improved data use in health management at the district level in Malawi health management information system.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effective use of Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) is critical for strengthening decision-making and resource allocation in healthcare, particularly in low and middle-income countries such as Malawi. Yet, district level data use remains constrained by institutional challenges that undermine the potential of HMIS. This study proposes a framework to enhance data use in health management at the district level, drawing on institutional theory and the dynamics of coercive, normative and mimetic pressures. A qualitative approach was employed, including semi-structured interviews, participant observations, and documents analysis, to examine how these pressures shape data practices within Malawi's health sector. Findings reveal that improved data use depends on key activities such as regulating practices, building human capacity, sustaining efforts, integrating data tools and platforms, coordinating processes and partnerships, motivating contributions, and sharing best practices. By addressing these institutional concerns, the proposed framework offers actionable recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to foster a culture of data use, strengthen health management decision-making, and advance ICT4D scholarship on HMIS effectiveness and health outcomes in low and middle-income settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.