Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42125060›Full record

ArticleBeilstein journal of organic chemistry2026

Computational prediction of C-H hydricities and their use in predicting the regioselectivity of electron-rich C-H functionalisation reactions.

Rasmus M Borup, Nicolai Ree, Jan H Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beilstein journal of organic chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rasmus M BorupDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-1345
Nicolai ReeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-5730
Jan H JensenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1465-1010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present HAlator, a fully automated quantum chemistry (QM) workflow for computing C-H hydricities and explore its potential in predicting the regioselectivity of electron-rich C-H functionalisation reactions. The workflow was benchmarked against 35 experimentally determined C-H hydricities in DMSO, yielding a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.43 kcal/mol and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 5.45 kcal/mol. Leveraging this approach, we generated a dataset of 3278 C-H sites across 740 molecules to train a machine learning (ML) model based on CM5 atomic charge descriptors, achieving an MAE of 2.30 kcal/mol and an RMSE of 3.74 kcal/mol relative to QM-computed hydricities. The method was further applied to 250 hydride transfer-like reactions, including C-N, C-C, and C-X bond formations, carbene insertions, and oxidative transformations. Comparative analysis with ALFABET, a bond dissociation energy (BDE)-based ML model, reveals that hydricity predictions, when combined with steric accessibility, correctly identify the reactive site in eight out of ten representative reactions, surpassing BDEs in most cases. These findings highlight hydricity as a complementary and, in some cases, superior descriptor for guiding regioselectivity predictions in electron-rich C-H functionalisation. The model is made available at regioselect.org, together with a host of other reactivity predictors.

Indexed as

bond dissociation energyhydricityhydride affinityhydride-transfer reactionsmachine learning (ML)quantum chemistry (QM)

Identifiers

PMID42125060
PMCPMC13159236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.