ArticleBMJ public health2026
Impacts of the Universal Credit welfare reform on well-being: a natural experiment study using UK population survey data.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Guide to recent advances in difference-in-differences methodology for population health studies.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Universal Credit (UC) was a large-scale reform of the UK welfare system, replacing six existing benefits. UC aimed to simplify claims and encourage more claimants into work. Previous research has found evidence of harm to the mental health of recipients, potentially exacerbating existing health inequalities. We identify the effect of UC on self-reported measures of psychological well-being, treating the phased rollout from 2013 to 2018 as a natural experiment. Methods: We estimated differences in psychological well-being outcomes associated with the staggered introduction of the UC across local authorities, using areas where UC was not yet available as controls. We included working-age (aged 18-64 years) respondents of the Annual Population Survey in Great Britain from 2012 to 2019 (n=245 658), living in low-income households. We used the four self-reported measures of psychological well-being recorded in the survey: Life Satisfaction, Happiness, Life Worthwhile and Anxiety. We tested for differential effects by disability, age, caring responsibilities, sex, country, ethnicity, education and household structure. Results: UC was associated with per-claimant decreases in Life Satisfaction (-0.66; 95% CI -1.01 to -0.30), Happiness (-0.41; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.05) and Life Worthwhile (-0.73; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.42), and increases in Anxiety (+0.79; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.27). These changes were 2-6 times as large as the effects on well-being of the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents in Wales and Scotland saw comparatively greater effects compared with those in England across several outcomes. UC exposure saw greater comparative increases in anxiety among people with disabilities (+0.19; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.27), single people (+0.13; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.21) and people aged under 25 years (+0.27; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.39). Conclusions: The introduction of UC had adverse effects across all four measures of well-being. Vulnerable groups typically experienced greater harms, reinforcing calls for reforms to UC to reduce the health and well-being impacts of poverty and unemployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.