ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Blonanserin transdermal patch for treating delirium: A case series.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Antipsychotics are commonly recommended for the treatment of delirium; however, alternative options are warranted due to the limitations of oral and injectable formulations. The blonanserin (BNS) transdermal patch may improve treatment adherence; however, evidence regarding its efficacy in managing delirium remains limited. Methods: This retrospective case series describes 51 cases of delirium managed with BNS patches at Kyoto University Hospital between January 2020 and June 2022. The effectiveness of the BNS patch for delirium, the rationale for its selection, and the associated adverse events were retrospectively evaluated using electronic medical records. Delirium was diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition criteria by physicians from the consultation-liaison or palliative care teams, and the symptoms were regularly monitored. Effectiveness was assessed based on non-standardized clinical judgment documented in the medical records. Results: Hyperactive and mixed delirium were observed in 41.2% and 56.9% of patients, respectively. Overall, the therapeutic response rate across all patients was 84.3%. The main reasons for the selection of BNS patches were difficulty or inability to take oral medications (60.8%). Adverse events occurred in 29.4% of patients; all resolved after discontinuation of the BNS patch, and no serious or irreversible reactions were observed. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the BNS patch has potential as an effective treatment option for delirium, particularly in patients with challenges in the administration of medication. However, given the retrospective and exploratory nature of this study, the findings should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.