Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42124923›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026

Improvements in antimicrobial reporting in Australian and New Zealand laboratories after publication of national guidelines: a follow-up survey from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs.

Juliet Elvy, Katherine Ryan, Melanie Otormin, Menuk Jayawardena, Maryza Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliet ElvyRoyal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP), Microbiology Discipline, Saint Leonards, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4482-6758
Katherine RyanRoyal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP), Microbiology Discipline, Saint Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Melanie OtorminRoyal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP), Microbiology Discipline, Saint Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Menuk JayawardenaRoyal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP), Microbiology Discipline, Saint Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Maryza GrahamDepartment of Microbiology, Monash Pathology, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In 2017, a Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) laboratory survey demonstrated suboptimal antimicrobial susceptibility reporting practices. In response, the RCPA published Selective Reporting of Antimicrobials Guidelines to support selective and cascade reporting of antimicrobials. We sought to revisit laboratory antimicrobial reporting practices since these guidelines were published. Materials and methods: We carried out a repeat of the laboratory survey in 2023 and compared results to the previous 2017 report. We also studied antimicrobial reporting practices from two routine external quality assurance (EQA) samples dispatched by the RCPAQAP. Results: In 2023, compared with 2017, there was an overall improvement in selective reporting and a reduction in reporting of antibiotics inappropriate for bacteraemia. For a fully susceptible Conclusions: We demonstrate an improvement in selective antimicrobial reporting following the publication of national antimicrobial reporting guidelines for laboratories, but opportunities for further improvement and standardization remain. This work is encouraging and highlights how microbiology laboratories can be supported to contribute to antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Identifiers

PMID42124923
PMCPMC13158014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.