ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Machine Learning-Based Depression Recognition With Preserved Efficacy From Compressed EEG Signals Using Wavelet Transform and Adaptive Filtering.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of MPEG-4 AAC Audio Codec Using EEG and EMG Signals for Use with DICOM® Neurophysiology.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are critical for diagnosing neurological disorders like depression but require substantial storage, posing challenges for telemedicine. This paper proposes a novel lossy compression method integrating two-dimensional zigzag and spiral rearrangement, wavelet transform (bior4.4), and adaptive filtering to minimise storage while preserving depression recognition accuracy. Using the Hospital University Sains Malaysia (HUSM) dataset (34 depressed, 30 healthy subjects), EEG signals were converted into 2D matrices, compressed with four wavelet encoders (SPIHT, STW, EZW, LVL-MMC), and reconstructed. A feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) with 80 features (relative wavelet energy and entropy) classified depressed and healthy individuals. The combination of zigzag and STW methods achieved a compression ratio (CR) of 89.30, a percentage root-mean-square distortion (PRD) of 0.23, and a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 58.80 dB, with depression recognition accuracy of 90.2%. Classification was performed on both original and reconstructed signals to evaluate the effect of compression on diagnostic performance. Notably, compressed signals occasionally outperformed original signals, likely due to noise reduction. This method offers a robust solution for efficient EEG storage and accurate depression diagnosis in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.