ArticleHealth science reports2026
Safety of Topical Essential Oil Herbal Ointments: A Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Plants hold significant promise for dermatological applications. However, the potential for phytochemicals, particularly essential oils, to cause skin irritation or sensitization necessitates rigorous safety evaluation for products derived from medicinal plants. This Phase I study was therefore designed to investigate the safety profile of three novel herbal ointment formulations prepared from essential oils on the healthy human skin of volunteers. Methods: An open-label, randomized controlled Phase I trial was conducted with 30 healthy volunteers in Ethiopia. Participants were randomly assigned (10 each) to one of the three investigational herbal ointments in a 1:1:1 ratio. For each participant, placebo (vehicle), 2%, and 5% concentrations of the allocated investigational product were applied concurrently using an occlusive patch test, followed by a photo-patch test and a repeated open application test (ROAT). Participants were followed for 14 days to monitor for skin reactions and adverse events. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of serious adverse reactions (SAR) associated with investigational products. Results: All 30 enrolled participants completed the study with full adherence to the required procedures as per the protocol. No serious adverse reaction related to the investigational herbal products (IHPs) were observed throughout the trial. A total of six non-serious adverse events were recorded among five study participants, none of which was assessed as related to the IHPs. Baseline and end-of-study laboratory parameters and vital signs remained stable, with no clinically significant abnormalities detected. Conclusion: All three investigational herbal ointment formulations demonstrated a favorable safety profile when applied to healthy human skin. These findings support further clinical development of the products and warrant subsequent studies to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy for the intended dermatological application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.