Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42124767›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Development and Validation of a Low-Cost Simulation Tool for Practical Training in Diagnostic Bronchoscopy for Otolaryngology Postgraduates.

Yallanti Jothir Surya Teja, Lokesh Kumar Penubarthi, Dinesh Kumar V, Joel A Sherry, Anbarasi Madoure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yallanti Jothir Surya TejaOtorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Lokesh Kumar PenubarthiOtorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Dinesh Kumar VAnatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Joel A SherryOtorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Anbarasi MadoureOtorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The objectives of this study are to develop and validate a low-cost, low-fidelity simulation model for diagnostic bronchoscopy training among otolaryngology postgraduates (PGs) and to assess realism, educational utility, and learner confidence. Methods We constructed a simulation model replicating pediatric airway anatomy using locally available materials (INR 1,000). Twenty-six otolaryngology residents participated in structured simulation sessions. Face, content, curriculum, and transfer validity were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale survey. Statistical analysis employed the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results  The participants reported high validity scores across all domains (median ≥ 4), with significant post-training confidence improvement (p < 0.001). No difference in scores existed between residents from different training years across validity domains (p > 0.05). Conclusion This low-cost bronchoscopy simulator effectively improves procedural confidence and aligns with curricular needs. It provides a practical and scalable training solution for resource-limited settings and early-stage residency programs.

Indexed as

bronchoscopyclinical competencemedical educationmedical residencyotorhinolaryngologypatient simulation

Identifiers

PMID42124767
PMCPMC13159498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.