ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Distinct Biological and Biomechanical Features in TMJ and Knee Cartilages.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and the knee joint are two of the most frequently used joints in the body, with the mandibular condylar cartilage (MCC) and the articular cartilage (AC) covering the joint bone surfaces, respectively. Compromised MCC functions lead to various temporomandibular disorders (TMD), including TMJ osteoarthritis (TMJ OA); however, the mechanisms governing MCC homeostasis and its biomechanical properties are still poorly understood. In this study, we comprehensively compared the biological and biomechanical features of the MCC and AC in mice. Histological analysis on P1, P21, 3-month, and 10-month mice revealed the most drastic structural differences between MCC and AC at occlusion establishment (P21), with MCC found to be more susceptible to age-associated cartilage degeneration. Immunostaining revealed differentially distributed cartilage extracellular matrix components in MCC and AC, including collagen type I, II, and X, and highly enriched expression of several key transcriptional factors at the posterior region of the MCC, including sex determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), and scleraxis (SCX). The posterior MCC also houses a group of long-lasting, slow-proliferative cells, as evidenced by the BrdU/EdU incorporation assay, suggesting the presence of a potential stem/progenitor cell niche at the posterior TMJ. Unbiased nanoindentation analysis revealed distinct biomechanical features between these joint cartilages. MCC exhibits a significantly lower elastic modulus (E
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.