In one paragraphArticle in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
18 authors.
Elisa FazzariDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-8587 Daria J AzizadDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-7015-9027 Matthew X LiDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0539-7389 Weihong GeDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-6291 Shivani BaisiwalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-9940 Dimitri CadetDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3518-608X Patricia R NanoDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5507-2656 Ryan L KanDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-8365 Travis PerrymanDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-5247-8898 Hong A TumDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christopher TseDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Carolina Varona ArguellesDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2771-245X Kunal S PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-9178 Linda M LiauDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4053-0052 Robert M PrinsDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6282-6583 David A NathansonDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-9159 Aparna BhaduriDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-6899 Funding
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2MThe UCSC Genome BrowserU24HG002371 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI Maximilian Haeussler · 2022 to 2026
$17.6MUCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152342 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Olujimi A Ajijola, David Wayne Dawson · 2024 to 2026
$5.3MA visualization interface for BRAIN single cell data, integrating transcriptomics, epigenomics and spatial assaysRF1MH132662 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAEUSSLER, MAXIMILIAN · 2023 to 2023
$866kBrain microenviornment-dependent lineage plasticity drives adaptation to targeted therapy in malignant gliomasF30CA295084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CADET, DIMITRI · 2024 to 2025
$83kNCI NIH HHS F30 CA295084NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG002371NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152342NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH132662
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Extensive molecular profiling has revealed profound heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM), yet how cellular lineages organize over time to govern tumor propagation and therapeutic response remains poorly understood. Existing single-cell approaches define transcriptional states but provide limited insight into how clonal dynamics shape functional tumor behavior. Here, we integrate high-complexity combinatorial DNA barcoding with single-cell transcriptomics in direct-from-patient IDH1-wild-type GBM, enabling lineage-resolved mapping of progenitor organization in a human microenvironmental context. Across 235,155 malignant cells from nine tumors, clonal relationships form reproducible lineage tracks in which distinct progenitor populations give rise to specific differentiated cell types, revealing that tumor growth is sustained by multiple non-redundant progenitors rather than a single dominant population. These progenitors exhibit distinct propensities for self-renewal, fate restriction, and cross-compartment interactions, collectively accounting for the full spectrum of tumor states. Using this lineage-resolved framework, we identify complementary drug targets in distinct progenitor compartments and demonstrate that hierarchy-informed combination therapies disrupt progenitor-progenitor interactions and reshape lineage output. These findings move beyond descriptive heterogeneity to define functional logic underlying GBM propagation and establish a generalizable framework for rational, cell type-specific combinatorial therapies.
Identifiers
PMID42124710
PMCPMC13160050
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390