ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Closed-loop error damping in human BCI using pre-error motor cortex activity.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are used to decode motor intent from neural population activity; their main clinical application is to restore function for individuals with motor or communication deficits. However, when trying to reconstruct movement trajectories, such as in computer cursor control, even state-of-the-art decoders fall short of able-bodied performance during online BCI control. This calls for alternative approaches to improve the usability of motor BCIs. Here, we leveraged an error signal, i.e. a neural correlate of faulty motor control that can be detected from neural activity. By detecting this error signal in parallel to performing movement decoding, it is possible to perform error modulation, i.e. real-time error detection and correction during a closed-loop motor BCI task. We analyzed data from four individuals with upper limb impairment due to cervical spinal cord injury who each used an intracortical BCI to perform a continuous cursor control task with visual feedback. A classifier was trained to detect the error signal and was used to perform online error detection during BCI control to limit ongoing errors (defined as movement of the controller away from its target) without requiring any specific action from the participants. Our contribution is three-fold. First, we show that the error signal has a pre-error component. Cortical activity was already significantly modulated before the onset of the kinematically-defined error, theoretically allowing for earlier detection. Second, we show that error modulation significantly improves performance during online BCI control of cursor kinematics. Finally, we show that the error signal can be robustly leveraged across contexts, as error modulation improves performance in more complex motor tasks (involving for instance grasp and drag actions) or other environments without task-specific calibration. Overall, our results suggest that the error signal can be robustly disentangled from motor intent in cortical activity, and that even a simple linear classifier can enable error modulation in parallel to a continuous kinematic decoder, yielding more reliable and accurate BCI control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.