ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Neural substrates underlying the expectation of rewards resulting from effortful exertion.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Why do people persist-or stop-when rewards require effort? Such choices are often framed as a trade-off between reward and cost, yet this conceptualization overlooks a fundamental determinant: expectations. Economic theories propose that labor supply is reference-dependent, responding to deviations from expected earnings, but whether such reference points govern effort and how they are implemented in the brain has remained unknown. Using an incentivized grip-force paradigm with functional magnetic resonance imaging, we experimentally imposed reward expectations independent of outcomes. Effort provision shifted systematically with these expectations, demonstrating that individuals evaluate exertion relative to a reference point rather than absolute incentives. Activity in the ventral striatum encoded both prospective reward expectations and deviations between realized and expected earnings, and these signals predicted inter-individual differences in reference-dependent effort. These findings identify a neural mechanism by which expectations recalibrate the value of exertion, revealing reference dependence as a fundamental principle of motivated behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.