Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42124630›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Counteraction of HMGB1 at ss-dsDNA junctions maintains liquidity of protamine-DNA co-condensates.

Vikhyaat Ahlawat, Divya Kota, Huan-Xiang Zhou

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vikhyaat AhlawatDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago IL 60607, USA.
Divya KotaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago IL 60607, USA.
Huan-Xiang ZhouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago IL 60607, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9020-0302

Funding

Quantitative, Mechanistic Studies of Biomolecular RecognitionR35GM118091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Huan-Xiang Zhou · 2016 to 2026
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the sperm nucleus, protamine replaces histones to mediate extreme DNA compaction. The histone-to-protamine transition involves the occurrence of double-strand breaks, and is facilitated by transition proteins including those containing high-mobility-group (HMG) boxes. Here we used optical tweezers and microscopy to study the actions of HMGB1 and protamine on DNA. Confocal scans of GFP-HMGB1 on overstretched λ-DNA show 2-3 foci that spread on the DNA upon retraction. Spreading of foci coincides with reannealing of ssDNA tracks, confirming their localization at ss-dsDNA junctions. Whereas the force-extension curves of protamine-bound λ-DNA show tangles that withstand forces > 60 pN, premixing protamine with HMGB1 produces only bends and bridges (~ 20 pN). The counteraction of HMGB1 involves its acidic C-terminal tail, as HMGB1-ΔC fails to prevent tangle formation. In line with these single-molecule results, brightfield and confocal imaging shows that HMGB1 converts protamine-dsDNA aggregates into liquid droplets whereas HMGB1-ΔC fails to do so. Together, these observations support our hypothesis that chromatin-associated proteins like HMGB1 help maintain early protamine-mediated DNA condensates in a liquid state, enabling the recruitment of the repair machinery to restore the duplex structure.

Indexed as

biomolecular condensateshistone-to-protamine transitionoptical tweezersprotaminesingle-molecule force spectroscopytransition protein

Identifiers

PMID42124630
PMCPMC13160060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.