Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42124490›Full record

SynthesisEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2026

EPA guidance on cultural competence training: a critical update and meta-review.

Meryam Schouler-Ocak, Julia Zielke, Sofie Bäärnhielm, Ilaria Tarricone, Jerzy Samochowiec, Apostolos Veizis, Ahmet Tamer Aker, Pascal Markus Lemmer, Adrian Hagenguth, Dinesh Bhugra

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meryam Schouler-OcakDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin AND Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité at St. Hedwig Hospital, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, https://ror.org/001w7jn25Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1846-3500
Julia ZielkeInstitute for Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, https://ror.org/001w7jn25Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-5913
Sofie Bäärnhielmhttps://ror.org/00m8d6786Karolinska University Hospital: Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Sweden.
Ilaria Tarriconehttps://ror.org/01111rn36Alma Mater Studiorum Universita di Bologna: Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.
Jerzy Samochowiechttps://ror.org/01v1rak05Pomeranian Medical University: Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Szczecinie, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1438-583X
Apostolos Veizishttps://ror.org/00bm99g65Schering Plough Greece: MSD Greece, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-0315
Ahmet Tamer Akerhttps://ror.org/04pm4x478Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi, Türkiye.
Pascal Markus Lemmerhttps://ror.org/001w7jn25Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-6764
Adrian Hagenguthhttps://ror.org/001w7jn25Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-2720-5877
Dinesh Bhugrahttps://ror.org/0220mzb33King's College London Department of Social Science Health and Medicine: King's C, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-2480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCultural competence training has become increasingly common in psychiatric practice across Europe and worldwide, supported by evidence demonstrating improvements in quality of care, clinical effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. Since the publication of the original EPA guideline in 2015, the field has advanced considerably in its theoretical foundations, evidence base, and institutional support. This updated guideline addresses recent developments and challenges in research, policy, and clinical practice.

methodsThe guideline is based on a systematic meta-review of 15 systematic reviews and evidence-based guidelines on cultural competence training in psychiatric care and mental health. The evidence was synthesized to identify key concepts, educational components, implementation strategies, and current debates.

resultsThe review comprises four sections. First, it examines core elements of cultural competence training, emphasizing cultural humility, structural competence, and perspectives from the social and cultural sciences. Second, it provides practical recommendations for curriculum design, including the potential role of digital learning tools. Third, it addresses critiques of cultural competence, particularly concerns regarding essentializing and potentially racist interpretations. Finally, it explores strategies for integrating cultural competence training into existing psychiatric services, highlighting both individual and organizational factors that support implementation.

conclusionCultural competence benefits not only migrant and ethnically diverse populations but all patients and healthcare professionals, including members of majority cultures. Successful implementation requires cultural sensitivity, critical self-reflection, and sustained commitment at individual, organizational, and system levels to achieve meaningful and lasting improvements in psychiatric care.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyMental Health ServicesPsychiatryEuropeHumanscultural competencecultural humilitymental healthmigrationtraining

Identifiers

PMID42124490
PMCPMC13359007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.