Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42124413›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026

[Clinicopathological, Genomic Characteristics and Prognostic Analysis in 18 Cases 
of SMARCA4-deficient or SMARCA4-mutated Pulmonary Tumors].

Chang Liu, Jing Yang, Fanlu Meng, Linlin Zhang, Xin Wang, Tao Yu, Diansheng Zhong

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chang Liu *Department of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Jing Yang *Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Fanlu MengDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Linlin ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Tao YuDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Diansheng ZhongDepartment of Oncology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of SMARCA4-altered pulmonary tumors primarily relies on the detection of protein loss by immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, the concordance between IHC and genetic testing results, as well as the clinical and biological differences caused by various mutation types, require further investigation. This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological, genomic characteristics, as well as the prognosis, of these tumors.

methodsA total of 18 consecutive cases of pulmonary tumor patients with SMARCA4 deficiency/mutation confirmed by IHC or genetic testing were retrospectively enrolled for clinical, genomic, and prognostic analysis. Based on the variant type, patients were categorized into Class 1 (protein loss or loss-of-function gene mutations, n=10) and Class 2 (missense mutation or other variants of unknown significance without protein loss, n=8) for intergroup comparison.

resultsSeventeen cases were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and one was diagnosed with thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SD-UT). Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis revealed that truncating mutations consistently led to protein loss, whereas missense mutations mostly did not. Two cases with protein loss but negative genetic testing results were identified. Class 1 alterations showed trends towards higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) (median 9.3 vs 4.7 Muts/Mb) and lower programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (60.0% vs 25.0% with <1% expression) compared to Class 2, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Two patients with co-occurring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R mutations showed poor initial response to third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy, but the efficacy was observed after combination with other therapies. Among stage IV patients, the median overall survival (OS) was 10.3 months for Class 1 and 19.9 months for Class 2 (P=0.967). Fourteen patients (77.8%) received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy. Among them, 8 patients (57.1%) achieved an OS exceeding 12 months, and 7 patients (50.0%) exceeded 24 months.

conclusionsSMARCA4 gene mutations are not entirely consistent with IHC protein loss, necessitating combined interpretation. When SMARCA4 alterations co-exist with EGFR mutations, targeted monotherapy efficacy may be limited, and combination strategies should be considered. Classifying SMARCA4 alterations into Class 1 and Class 2 may have prognostic implications and could help predict the tumor immune microenvironment status (TMB and PD-L1). ICIs combined with chemotherapy is currently one of the main treatment options for patients with advanced SMARCA4-altered pulmonary tumors and showed potential efficacy in this study.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA HelicasesGenomicsLung NeoplasmsMutationNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesDNA HelicasesNuclear ProteinsSMARCA4 protein, humanTranscription FactorsEGFR mutationImmune checkpoint inhibitorsLung neoplasmsPrognosisSMARCA4 (BRG1) deficiencySMARCA4 mutationTargeted therapyThoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor

Identifiers

PMID42124413
PMCPMC13167991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.