ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Microleakage and Torque Loss at the Implant-Abutment Interface in Original Versus Non-Original Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microleakage at the implant-abutment interface represents a potential pathway for bacterial penetration and may contribute to peri-implant inflammation, marginal bone loss, and mechanical complications such as screw loosening. The increasing clinical use of compatible prosthetic abutments as cost-effective alternatives to original components has raised concerns regarding their fit, sealing capacity, and mechanical stability at this interface. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate differences in sealing capacity and torque loss between original and non-original abutments in a mixed internal connection implant system and to investigate the applicability of a novel quantitative approach for assessing microleakage based on a hydraulic conductance perfusion system. Nine abutments, including four multi-unit and five screw-retained cementable abutments, were connected to Straumann Bone Level implants at two tightening torques (5 N·cm and 35 N·cm). Microleakage was quantified by measuring fluid transport across the implant-abutment interface using the perfusion system, and removal torque values were recorded after testing. Non-original abutments exhibited significantly greater microleakage than original abutments at both torque levels. Microleakage increased significantly when the installation torque was reduced to 5 N·cm. At the manufacturer-recommended torque, screw-retained cementable abutments demonstrated higher microleakage than multi-unit abutments. Non-original abutments also showed significantly greater torque loss. These findings suggest that original abutments provide improved sealing capacity and mechanical stability at the implant-abutment interface, while the hydraulic conductance perfusion system represents a promising quantitative tool for investigating microleakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.