ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Circular Material Value Retention Framework for Agricultural By-Product Valorisation.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While valorisation pathways are increasingly promoted as sustainable solutions, their ability to genuinely minimise environmental harm and contribute to long-term material circularity remains uneven. This study systematically identifies and maps existing valorisation routes across the EU and UK, with particular attention to their environmental performance and economic viability through a material value retention lens. A literature review highlights a spectrum of practices-from soil amendment and composting to bioenergy recovery and bio-based construction materials-each offering different sustainability benefits but varying significantly in their capacity to preserve material quality and function. To address the absence of robust comparative approaches, this paper introduces a novel evaluative framework centred on intrinsic material value retention, a key principle in sustainable and circular material systems. Building on established scholarship, the framework provides a structured means of comparing valorisation options based on how effectively they conserve material properties, particularly in terms of the material's structural and functional values, and enable high-value reuse. Supported by a dedicated classification tool and a set of guiding questions refined through expert interviews, the framework complements existing environmental assessment methods by foregrounding material circularity. In doing so, it supports more integrated, holistic decision-making for the development of a resilient and sustainable circular bioeconomy. This research is intended for academic audiences and may also be of relevance to industry practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.