ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Influence of Tool-Axis Orientation on Dimensional Accuracy in Robot-Based Single Point Incremental Forming.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single point incremental forming (SPIF) represents a flexible manufacturing process capable of producing complex sheet metal parts without the need for dedicated forming dies. However, achieving high dimensional accuracy remains a major challenge due to phenomena such as elastic springback and localized deformation. In this context, the present study investigates the influence of tool-axis orientation on the dimensional accuracy of parts manufactured through robot-based single point incremental sheet forming (RB-SPIF). The experimental analysis considered two toolpath strategies (contour and spiral), two vertical step sizes (0.5 mm and 1 mm), and two tool-axis configurations (fixed tool-axis and wall-normal tool-axis orientation), resulting in eight experimental cases. The dimensional accuracy of the manufactured parts was evaluated using optical 3D scanning and cross-sectional profile analysis. The results show that the vertical step size has a significant influence on the resulting geometry, with smaller step sizes generating profiles closer to the nominal geometry. The toolpath strategy also affects the geometry, with spiral trajectories generally producing slightly improved profiles compared to contour strategies; however, this effect was not found to be statistically significant under the investigated conditions. Furthermore, the use of a wall-normal tool-axis configuration improves the agreement between the measured and nominal profiles by enhancing the contact conditions between the tool and the metal sheet surface. These findings indicate that adaptive tool-axis orientation represents a promising strategy for improving the dimensional accuracy of parts produced by robot-based incremental sheet forming systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.