Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42124152›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Enhanced Wear Resistance of Tungsten-Reinforced Brass Surface Composite Produced Through Friction Stir Processing at Varying Tool Rotational Speed.

Haitham M Alswat, Karpagarajan Sivaraman, Balamurugan Chinnasamy, Vigneshwaran Soundararaja Perumal, El-Sayed I Abdel Aziz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haitham M AlswatDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Riyadh 11911, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-9259
Karpagarajan SivaramanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Engineering College, Perambalur 621212, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-0830
Balamurugan ChinnasamyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vigneshwaran Soundararaja PerumalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram Campus, Chennai 600089, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0050-7587
El-Sayed I Abdel AzizMaterial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8655-4543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the effect of tool rotational speed on the microstructure and dry sliding wear behavior of brass-tungsten (brass/W) surface composites fabricated through friction stir processing. Microstructural analysis confirmed a uniform distribution of tungsten particles within the stir zone, with no observable clustering. Improved properties were achieved at a lower traverse speed of 40 mm/min combined with a higher rotational speed of 1168 rpm, which promoted finer grain formation (~4 µm) and better particle dispersion. An increase in rotational speed led to a corresponding rise in hardness, from 142 HV at 832 rpm to 165 HV at 1168 rpm. In terms of wear behavior, the sample processed at lower rotational speed exhibited abrasive and micro-cutting wear, whereas the sample processed at higher rotational speed predominantly showed adhesive wear.

Indexed as

adhesion wearbrassfriction stir processinghardnessmicrostructuresliding wear behaviorsurface compositetool rotational speedtungsten particlewear resistance

Identifiers

PMID42124152
PMCPMC13165231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.