ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Transfer Learning from Homogeneous to Heterogeneous: Fine-Tuning a Pretrained Interatomic Potential for Multicomponent Mo Alloys with Localized Substitutional Alloying.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Driven Refinement of Reactive Force Fields via Hierarchical "Center-Environment" Features for Energetic Molecular Crystals.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are typically developed for globally ordered homogeneous systems (GOHomS), which exhibit only minor local deviations from equilibrium configurations. Consequently, most existing MLIPs trained on GOHomS often perform inadequately when applied to locally ordered heterogeneous systems (LOHetS), e.g., substitutional alloying elements in multicomponent alloys. To describe doping alloy systems, we develop a fine-tuned MLIP based on the MACE foundation model, specifically tailored for Mo-based dilute alloys containing one or two out of 20 substitutional elements: Cr, Fe, Mn, Nb, Re, Ta, Ti, V, W, Y, Zr, Al, Zn, Cu, Ag, Au, Hg, Co, Ni, and Hf. The model is built on more than 7000 equilibrium and non-equilibrium structures derived from first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The optimized large-scale fine-tuned model attains state-of-the-art accuracy, with a mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 2.27 meV/atom and 3.79 meV/atom for energy predictions, and 13.83 meV/Å and 24.26 meV/Å for force predictions, respectively. Systematic evaluation under different data-splitting protocols shows that unknown element extrapolation remains challenging under strict dopant hold-out, whereas substantially improved accuracy can be achieved in partial-exposure transfer settings. The fine-tuned models reduce the MAE by approximately 7-10 times compared to models trained from scratch, and by 10-20 times relative to zero-shot foundation models. This performance gain remains consistent across varying dataset sizes (equilibrium vs. non-equilibrium structures) and model scales. Our work illustrates the efficacy of transfer learning from globally ordered homogeneous systems to locally ordered heterogeneous multicomponent alloy environments. However, direct transfer to entirely unknown elements remains challenging, especially when proxy embeddings are employed without fine-tuning. Thus, to achieve high accuracy without incurring additional cost, it is essential to include unknown elements in the training dataset while minimizing the number of configurations containing known elements. Moreover, the current findings are primarily validated for dilute Mo-based alloy systems. Extending this approach to more compositionally complex alloy spaces may necessitate additional data and further fine-tuning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.