ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and Optimisation of an Industrial Waste-Based Additive for Improving Concrete Performance.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the development and optimization of a multi-component modifying additive based on industrial waste for improving the mechanical and durability properties of concrete. The additive consists of microsilica (Ms), phosphogypsum (PhG), soapstock (Sp), and post-alcohol bard (PaB), and its performance was evaluated using a staged experimental approach. The results showed that the optimal content of microsilica is 20% of the cement mass; the optimal content of phosphogypsum is 15% of the combined mass of the cement and microsilica; the optimal content of soapstock is 10% of the total mass of the cement, microsilica, and phosphogypsum; and the optimal post-alcohol bard is 5% of the water mass. At these concentrations, the compressive strength increased by up to 28.3% compared to the reference sample. Soapstock significantly reduced water absorption (up to 36.8%) and improved freeze-thaw resistance due to the hydrophobization of the cement matrix. However, excessive soapstock content led to a reduction in strength. The addition of post-alcohol bard provided a plasticizing effect and reduced water absorption, with the optimal concentration for strength being 2.5%, while the highest freeze-thaw resistance was observed at 5%. The combined effect of the components resulted in the formation of a denser microstructure and improved durability of concrete. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of industrial waste-based additives in enhancing concrete performance and durability, contributing to sustainable material development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.