SynthesisNutrients2026
Maternal Iodine Status During Pregnancy and Child Neurodevelopment: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIodine deficiency during pregnancy remains a leading cause of preventable neurodevelopmental impairment worldwide, yet quantitative characterization of the dose-response relationship between maternal iodine status and child neurodevelopment is lacking.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted for prospective cohort studies published up to February 2026 reporting associations between maternal iodine status and child neurodevelopmental outcomes across at least three exposure categories. All continuous effect estimates were converted to standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) to permit pooling across heterogeneous assessment instruments, and meta-analyses were stratified by neurodevelopmental domain (cognitive, language, motor, behavior, academic). A two-stage dose-response meta-analysis was used to characterize non-linearity. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
resultsTen prospective cohort publications corresponding to eight independent cohorts were included. After converting all continuous effect estimates to standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) and consolidating the three overlapping MoBa publications into a single cohort, the pooled analysis revealed a significant negative association between suboptimal maternal iodine status and child neurodevelopmental performance (Hedges' g = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.06,
conclusionsSuboptimal maternal iodine status during pregnancy was associated with modest decrements in child neurodevelopmental performance, with exploratory dose-response analyses suggesting that the fitted curves approached their maximum within a mid-range of dietary iodine intake. Although statistical evidence for quadratic non-linearity was attenuated after consolidating overlapping cohorts, the directional pattern across indicators remained consistent with an inverted U-shaped relationship, supporting maintenance of adequate but not excessive iodine nutrition during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.