ArticleNutrients2026
Adoption of an Early Enteral Nutrition Feeding Protocol in Patients Receiving an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant.
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute Graft versus Host Disease (aGvHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Enteral nutrition (EN) has been associated with improved transplant outcomes, yet standardized early EN practices remain inconsistently adopted across centers.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated the adoption and clinical outcomes of a standardized Day +1 EN protocol in patients undergoing Allo-SCT. The protocol included feeding tube (FT) placement on Day +1 with EN initiated at 25 mL/h. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from electronic health records for patients treated after protocol adoption (post-protocol) and retrospective controls from one year prior (pre-protocol group). Outcomes included successful Day +1 EN initiation, gastrointestinal (GI) complications, FT removal reason, and occurrence and severity of lower GI and overall aGvHD by Day +100 (Modified Glucksberg Criteria). Group comparisons used Welch's
resultsThe final cohort included 108 patients (67 pre-protocol and 41 post-protocol). Successful Day +1 EN initiation occurred in 95.1% (n = 39) of patients post-protocol versus 4.5% (n = 3) pre-protocol (
conclusionsAdoption of a standardized Day +1 EN protocol in Allo-SCT patients was successfully implemented and well-tolerated without adverse FT-related events. The significant difference in lower GI GvHD occurrence in the post-protocol group warrants confirmation of Day+1 EN in patients receiving an Allo-SCT in a future randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.