ReviewNutrients2026
Sustainable Insect-Based Diets in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Prevalence, Acceptability and Impact on Nutritional Status.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition-including undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies and overweight-remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, largely driven by food insecurity. Edible insects have been proposed as a sustainable, nutrient-dense dietary alternative with potential to improve food security and nutritional outcomes. This review analyses studies published until January 2024 in PubMed and Google Scholar assessing the prevalence, acceptability and nutritional impact of insect-based diets in sub-Saharan Africa. Thirteen original studies, predominantly qualitative, conducted in 8 of 47 countries in the region, met inclusion criteria. Two reviews provided additional evidence. Most studies focused on acceptability, which was strongly influenced by cultural and religious norms. Higher acceptance was observed among older individuals and those with lower educational attainment, while younger and more urbanized populations showed greater reluctance. Reported motivations for consumption included tradition, taste and perceived nutritional value. Some studies highlighted potential health risks related to food safety and the need for improved regulatory frameworks. The available nutritional analyses showed that edible insects are rich in protein and essential micronutrients, particularly iron and zinc, suggesting their potential to address common deficiencies. Although evidence on long-term nutritional impact remains limited, current findings support the feasibility and potential public health relevance of promoting insect-based diets in low-income settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.