Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42123879›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Preanalytical Quality Evaluation of Low-Volume Citrate Evacuated Blood Collection Tubes-Anticoagulant Solution Volume Accuracy, pH, and Anionic-Cationic Composition.

Nataša Gros, Zala Hriberšek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nataša GrosFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, SI1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8316-8017
Zala HriberšekFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, SI1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P1-0153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood collection tubes are widely used medical devices. Inaccurate citrate anticoagulant concentration can influence the results of coagulation tests. The producer's expertise and responsibility are considered the quality safeguards. However, the tubes undergo changes during their lifecycle, partly due to storage conditions, and the end user or a third party has no comprehensive insight. A methodology is necessary to reveal the tube's inherent characteristics. We provide insight into the anionic-cationic composition and pH of anticoagulant solutions in commercial tubes using high-performance ion exchange chromatography on a purified water model, making the anticoagulant volume accuracy assessment possible through a direct dye-dilution method. The results revealed differences between the tubes of two producers, Greiner BIO-ONE (A and A(nr)) and BD (C). Tube C has the most accurate anticoagulant amount. Both brands contain buffered citrate. The method of buffer preparation is not a source of interferant for the spectrometric method of the tubes' quality evaluation. Acetate, formate, chloride, nitrite, sulfate, oxalate, bromide, and nitrate impurities were determined in anticoagulant solutions, all in tube A and some in the others. Tubes C exhibit the highest contamination with cations.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBlood Specimen CollectionCitric AcidAnionsCationsChromatography, Ion ExchangeHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationAnionsAnticoagulantsCationsCitric Acidanionic contaminantsanticoagulant volume accuracyblood collection tubescationic contaminantscitrate anticoagulant concentrationdye-dilution methodion exchange chromatography

Identifiers

PMID42123879
PMCPMC13164950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.