In one paragraphArticle in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Niroshan GajendraDepartment of Tracer Technology, Environmental Technology Section, Institute for Energy Technology, Instituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2819-3399 Anamaria Iulia TörökResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation Subsidiary, National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics, Donath 67, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Deniz AvsarDepartment of Tracer Technology, Environmental Technology Section, Institute for Energy Technology, Instituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway.ORCID 0009-0003-8157-1461 Mila Kristiina PelkonenDepartment of Environmental Safety and Radiation Protection, Environmental Technology Section, Institute for Energy Technology, Instituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-9958 Simion Bogdan AngyusResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation Subsidiary, National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics, Donath 67, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8073-6760 Ragne Lundeby GrønvoldDepartment of Environmental Safety and Radiation Protection, Environmental Technology Section, Institute for Energy Technology, Instituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway.
Claudiu TănăseliaResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation Subsidiary, National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics, Donath 67, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-787X Erika Andrea LeveiResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation Subsidiary, National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics, Donath 67, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0145-0287 Laura Ferrando-ClimentDepartment of Tracer Technology, Environmental Technology Section, Institute for Energy Technology, Instituttveien 18, 2007 Kjeller, Norway.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Mining wastewater contains complex mixtures of regulated and emerging contaminants that challenge treatment technologies. This study evaluates the bioremediation potential of 10 phytoplankton species, including
Indexed as
Biodegradation, EnvironmentalMiningWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalChlorella vulgarisFernsPhytoplanktonWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalbioremediationemerging contaminantsmining wastewaterphycoremediationphytoremediationscreening experimentstoxic elements
Identifiers
PMID42123859
PMCPMC13164779
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390