ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Chloramphenicol Residue Analysis in Food and Environmental Matrices: Regulatory Framework and Advances in Trace-Level Determination.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Laboratory Innovations: Nanoscale Detection of Chloramphenicol Using Nanomaterial Biosensors.Analytical science advances · 2026Review
- Sublethal Concentration of Chloramphenicol Threatens the Health ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A novel electrochemiluminescence aptasensor based on "ON-OFF-ON" signal switching strategy for chloramphenicol detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chloramphenicol is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent whose use in food-producing animals is prohibited in many countries due to its association with severe adverse effects, including idiosyncratic aplastic anemia and genotoxicity. Despite these restrictions, chloramphenicol residues continue to be detected in food products, environmental compartments, and biological matrices, highlighting the need for reliable and sensitive analytical monitoring. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current analytical strategies for the detection of drugs in food and environmental samples, covering screening and confirmatory techniques, sample preparation approaches, and regulatory aspects. Rapid screening methods, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs), and biosensors based on antibodies, aptamers, and molecularly imprinted polymers, enable fast and cost-effective preliminary detection. Recent advances in nanomaterials and signal amplification strategies, including fluorescent reporters and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), have significantly improved sensitivity and assay performance. However, confirmatory methods based on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) remain the reference standard due to their superior selectivity, sensitivity, and quantitative reliability. Attention is given to sample preparation workflows, including QuEChERS-based protocols and microextraction techniques, which enable efficient analysis of complex matrices. Finally, current regulatory frameworks and analytical challenges related to zero-tolerance policies are discussed, emphasizing the importance of robust and validated analytical methods for effective monitoring and food safety assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.