ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
White Lupin Genomic Selection for Adaptation to Drought or Moderately Calcareous Soil: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) may improve the adaptation of white lupin to drought or moderately calcareous soil, enabling to realize its potential as a high-protein crop. This study aimed to (a) verify breeders' ability to identify the top-, mid-, and bottom-performing genotypes of published GS models of breeding lines and landrace genotypes for adaptation to drought and moderately calcareous soil; and (b) compare the top-performing materials produced by GS and phenotypic selection. Twelve selected genotypes were evaluated in four managed environments obtained through combining two soils (non-calcareous; moderately calcareous) with two water treatments (moderate terminal drought; moisture-favorable). GS based on the genotyping-by-sequencing of independent material was challenged by validation conditions that were partly different from the training ones and an imposed similarity of genomically predicted genotype phenology (to exploit drought resistance rather than drought escape). Grain yield reduction relative to favorable conditions averaged 19% for drought and 23% for calcareous soil. GS correctly identified the top-performing material for drought-prone or moderately calcareous soil, except for one model based on a small training set. The best GS lines performed comparably to the best phenotypically selected material. A higher harvest index was associated with better adaptation to drought and calcareous soil. Crossover genotype × water treatment interaction underpinned the selection for adaptation to drought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.