ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Gene Therapy in Hemophilia: Clinical Advances, Immunological Challenges, and Emerging Therapeutic Perspectives.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene therapy is reshaping the therapeutic paradigm in hemophilia by enabling sustained endogenous clotting factor production after a single administration. This approach moves disease management beyond lifelong replacement therapy. While clinical trials have demonstrated marked reductions in bleeding rates and treatment burden, real-world implementation has revealed emerging complexities. These include interindividual variability in transgene expression reflected by a progressive reduction in circulating FVIII or FIX activity over time, uncertainty regarding the long-term durability of expression, immune-mediated constraints, and episodes of transaminase elevation. This review addresses a critical transition point in the field: the shift from proof-of-concept efficacy toward integration of gene therapy into long-term hemophilia care. We examine determinants of therapeutic stability, host-vector immune interactions, and mechanisms underlying loss or fluctuation of expression, with emphasis on monitoring strategies and post-therapy management pathways. Immunogenic processes affecting vector transduction, hepatocellular responses, and transgene persistence are discussed alongside current approaches to immune modulation. This review uniquely focuses on post-gene therapy clinical integration rather than vector design or trial outcomes. Beyond direct factor correction, evolving therapeutic concepts targeting coagulation rebalancing and immune regulation are considered within a systems-based framework. Psychosocial adaptation and patient-reported outcomes are also explored, underscoring that therapeutic success extends beyond hemostatic control. In aggregate, these perspectives position gene therapy not as a singular curative event but as a component of an evolving, biologically integrated management strategy. Long-term follow-up translational research (LTFU) and coordinated global efforts will be essential to optimize durability, safety, and equitable access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.