Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42123499›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Generative Protein Design: From Deep Learning Algorithms to Translational Applications.

Shaotong Luo, Bo Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaotong LuoCollege of Aulin, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.
Bo ZhouCollege of Life Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7816-7017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has transformed protein design from a field long dominated by explicit energy-function optimization into one dominated by probabilistic generative modeling. In this review, we summarize the protein representation algorithmic basis for this transition, from sequence-centered encodings to geometric graph representations and, more recently, SE(3)-equivariant structural manifolds that directly respect three-dimensional symmetry. We classify current approaches into three methodological paradigms according to how sequence and structure are related during design: sequence-structure decoupled design, hybrid approaches, and sequence-structure co-design. For decoupled workflows, we discuss hallucination, backbone generation, and backbone-conditioned sequence design. For hybrid approaches, we examine integrated two-stage architectures and predictor-driven iterative co-refinement. For co-design, we review explicit joint generative formulations in which sequence and structure are treated as a coupled design state throughout generation. Additionally, we summarize evaluation principles for assessing the design results, such as physical validity, folding consistency, and design coverage, and then introduce some important applications in several fields. Taken together, these developments indicate that generative protein design is making progress from structure generation toward the programmable engineering of complex biological function.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProtein EngineeringProteinsAlgorithmsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsco-designdecoupled designdeep learninghybrid approachesprotein designSE(3)-equivariant

Identifiers

PMID42123499
PMCPMC13163955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.