SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Audiovestibular Dysfunction in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Clinical Evidence.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder is associated with substantial neurologic and systemic morbidity, but its relationship with audiovestibular dysfunction has not been clearly synthesized. This systematic review summarized human primary clinical evidence on auditory and vestibular manifestations, diagnostic findings, treatment, and prognosis in alcohol use disorder. PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to 4 February 2026; the review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261301021). Because study designs, clinical contexts, and outcome measures were highly heterogeneous, a structured qualitative synthesis was performed. Twelve human primary clinical studies were included. The available evidence supported objective auditory dysfunction, most commonly sensorineural hearing impairment with frequent high-frequency involvement. Vestibular involvement was also reported, but the evidence was smaller and less phenotypically specific, consisting mainly of syndromic reports, broad peripheral/central classifications, and historical nystagmographic findings. Direct treatment evidence was very limited; improvement after thiamine replacement was reported in alcohol-related Wernicke-spectrum presentations, but no established disease-specific therapy was identified. Overall, current human clinical evidence supports heightened clinical awareness but not disease-specific screening algorithms or targeted therapeutic recommendations. Better prospective studies using contemporary phenotype-based audiovestibular assessment are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.