ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
AI-Driven Secondary Immunomodulatory Effects of Conventional Drugs on Patient-Derived Macrophages.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The secondary immunomodulatory effects of conventional therapeutics, such as antibiotics and cytostatics, are frequently overlooked despite their significant clinical implications. Building on our previous findings that drugs like paclitaxel and doxorubicin heavily influence macrophage polarization-potentially driving metastasis or inflammation-this study systematically evaluates the secondary immune-modulating actions of standard drugs and natural adjuvants. Using patient-derived bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (ex vivo alveolar macrophages), we developed an analytical platform using synthetic carbohydrate-functionalized fluorescent ligands targeting key receptors (CD206, CD209, CD280, CD301). Integrating ligand-binding profiles with Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) yielded quantitative immune-state vectors capable of differentiating favorable and unfavorable prognostic signatures and imbalanced immune states. Pro-filing samples across heterogeneous respiratory conditions revealed highly con-text-dependent responses. While some treatments synergistically corrected unfavorable imbalanced profiles, others provoked dysregulation. Notably, in pneumonia or bronchitis with an asthma-prone M2-dominant profile, specific antibiotic regimens are critical; doxycycline, for instance, may exacerbate patient deterioration by further driving M2a polarization. Crucially, we identified that natural adjuvants (e.g., curcumin, coumarins, polyphenols) exhibit potent properties capable of correcting these adverse secondary drug effects. Ultimately, this profiling platform highlights the necessity of evaluating patient-specific secondary drug effects, offering a functional blueprint for precision immunotherapy and the rational design of adjuvant-enhanced treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.