ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Neurological Significance: Toward an Integrated Hematologic-Neurologic Perspective-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCSs) are entities in which a small hematological clone produces a monoclonal immunoglobulin capable of causing organ damage. Neurological involvement remains difficult to diagnose and treat, especially in the context of incidental monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)-peripheral neuropathy (PN) associations. We conducted a single-center retrospective study at Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, from January 2015 to December 2025. The reference population included 300 patients with MGUS. The diagnosis of MGNS was established clinically and/or electrophysiologically, with the exclusion of alternative causes of neuropathy. In total, 35 patients with MGNS were identified (prevalence 11.7%). Neuropathy was more common in IgM MGUS (36.7%) compared to IgG (15%), IgA (14.3%), or light chain MGUS (16.7%), with an increased risk for IgM (OR 3.27,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.