ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Machine Learning-Driven Metabolomic Biomarker Discovery in Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding and Overcoming Temozolomide Resistance Through CRISPR/Cas Technologies.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive tumor type known to recur after maximal safe surgical resection followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (temozolomide-TMZ), and adjuvant TMZ maintenance chemotherapy. It exhibits high intratumor heterogeneity within a single specimen, and thus clinical management remains a challenge due to its rapid progression and high recurrence rate. Machine learning algorithms are currently being implemented in biomarker discovery to develop accurate predictive models that can guide clinical decision making. Emerging evidence identifies metabolomics as a critical player in understanding tumor metabolism and progression. Machine learning computation models have been instrumental in GBM classification and biomarker discovery, as well as the evaluation of tumor staging. Metabolomic profiling of biogenic amines in the setting of surgery, chemoradiation, and understanding relapse also suggests a coordination between metabolic pathways and tumor stage. Many challenges in machine learning and metabolomics-based approaches for disease classification remain due to the dimensionality of datasets, as well as identifying more streamlined panels of metabolite biomarkers. The purpose of this review is to showcase the recent developments in the applications of machine learning in metabolomics as a promising approach to enhancing the biomarker discovery process for future classification and interpretation of patient response to therapies for GBM management in the clinical setting. It also presents the major challenges of implementing machine learning approaches in GBM management and its future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.