Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42123397›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

In Silico Study of Anti-CD40 DNA Aptamers as Vaccine Adjuvants for Chickens.

Juan Manuel Aceves-Hernández, Santiago Uribe Diaz, Abigeal Omolewu, Adil Sabr Al-Ogaili, Inkar Castellanos, María Inés Nicolas Vazquez, Alin Aurora Miramontes Salinas, Guillermo Tellez-Isaia, Young Min Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan Manuel Aceves-HernándezChemistry Department, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2351-7064
Santiago Uribe DiazDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8033-936X
Abigeal OmolewuDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Adil Sabr Al-OgailiLaboratory Techniques, Department of Medical, Kut Institute of Technology, Middle Technical University, Baghdad 10074, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-7353-5706
Inkar CastellanosDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
María Inés Nicolas VazquezChemistry Department, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Alin Aurora Miramontes SalinasChemistry Department, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Guillermo Tellez-IsaiaDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2416-2747
Young Min KwonDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2062-4270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a protein-docking study for eight DNA aptamers (SEQ1-SEQ8) against chicken Cluster of Differentiation 40 (chCD40), which were experimentally identified via SELEX in our previous study. In silico and molecular docking analyses were performed to predict and obtain the secondary and tertiary structures of the aptamers. Aptamers SEQ3 and SEQ4, which showed the best inhibitory effects, were selected and utilized to produce a DNA-based vaccine adjuvant using rolling circle amplification (RCA). These aptamers had been previously characterized via mass spectroscopy to determine their molecular weight and regions that could potentially interact with chCD40. In the present study, these results were corroborated and expanded. A series of free software methods, including Mfold v.1.0, 3dADN v.2.0, ClusPro v.2.0, Hdock v.1.0, and PLIP v.1.0, were used to determine the aptamers' secondary and tertiary structures and docking interactions, as well as the specific residues involved in the interactions and their distances. The structures were used to explain and thus understand their effect on the binding, selectivity, and stability of the aptamers. The main objective of the study was to determine whether these aptamers could be used as vaccine adjuvants against viral and bacterial pathogens, specifically chicken avian influenza. The docking results were in good agreement with the experimental and biological results. The procedure employed in this study could be an easy and effective tool for exploring the potential of the new technology of systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) in the preparation of aptamers to control viral and bacterial infections as well as diseases, such as cancer and Alzheimer's.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAptamers, NucleotideCD40 AntigensAnimalsChickensComputer SimulationInfluenza in BirdsMolecular Docking SimulationSELEX Aptamer TechniqueAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAptamers, NucleotideCD40 Antigensadjuvantsavian influenzachCD40chickensDNA aptamersmolecular dockingvaccines

Identifiers

PMID42123397
PMCPMC13163442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.