ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Tumor Budding in Gastric Carcinoma: Beyond Counting Cells at the Invasive Front-A Review of Current Evidence and Biological Perspectives.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FTO-Driven m6A Demethylation of TNC Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Gastric Cancer Metastasis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor budding is increasingly recognized as a histopathologic feature associated with invasive behavior in gastrointestinal malignancies. While its prognostic value is well established in colorectal carcinoma, its significance in gastric adenocarcinoma remains less clearly defined because of marked morphologic heterogeneity, variable growth patterns, and the absence of gastric-specific assessment criteria. Multiple studies have associated high budding density with adverse clinicopathologic features, including lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, advanced tumor stage, and poorer survival, particularly in intestinal-type tumors. However, these associations are more difficult to interpret in diffuse-type and mixed carcinomas, where intrinsic discohesion and architectural variability complicate the distinction between true budding and baseline growth patterns. Beyond prognostic assessment, tumor budding has been linked to localized alterations in cell adhesion, cytoskeletal organization, tumor-stroma interaction, and partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Emerging evidence also suggests that its biological significance may differ across molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. This review examines the current evidence on the definition, morphologic spectrum, methodological limitations, and biologic context of tumor budding in gastric adenocarcinoma. We propose that, in gastric cancer, tumor budding is best interpreted not as a uniformly applicable scoring parameter, but as a context-dependent morphologic indicator of invasive tumor remodeling whose meaning varies according to tumor architecture, stromal interface, and molecular subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.