ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Bridging Traditional Modeling and Artificial Intelligence in Measles Epidemiology: Methods, Applications, and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measles remains one of the most contagious infectious diseases globally and continues to pose substantial public health risks despite decades of effective vaccination. This narrative review examines both classical and contemporary computational approaches used for measles monitoring, prediction, and control, with particular attention given to the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI). We synthesized findings from 46 studies; 31 focused directly on measles and 15 on methodologically relevant studies from related infectious diseases (COVID-19, influenza, malaria), selected through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and preprint servers, conducted between June and December 2025. Traditional compartmental models (SIR, SEIR, MSEIR), statistical tools (ARIMA, SARIMA), and seroepidemiological analysis provide transparent, well-characterized frameworks for estimating transmission dynamics and simulating intervention scenarios. Spatial modeling, network analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations have added geographic granularity to outbreak characterization. More recently, AI and machine learning (ML) methods, including supervised algorithms (Random Forest, XGBoost, SVM), deep learning architectures (CNN, LSTM), and hybrid mechanistic ML models, have shown improved predictive performance by integrating multiple data sources: epidemiological records, demographic profiles, mobility patterns, and behavioral indicators. AI-based approaches appear most valuable for high-dimensional risk prediction and image-based diagnostic tasks, while classical models retain clear advantages for policy-oriented scenario analysis. However, no AI-based or hybrid model identified in this review has been adopted into routine national measles surveillance or used for vaccination policy decisions at scale. Important challenges remain: data quality varies across settings, model generalizability cannot be assumed, and computational infrastructure disparities limit deployment in high-burden regions. Explainable AI, federated learning, workforce training for model interpretation, and integration of vaccination registries with mobility and genomic surveillance data represent concrete future directions for strengthening computational support for measles elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.