Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122892›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Effects of Long-Term Organic Fertilization on Productivity, Stability, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rotation Systems of the Hetao Irrigation District.

Xue Zhang, Lanfang Bai, Na Zhao, Yongqiang Wang, Yu Yao, Fugui Wang, Zhen Wang, Hongwei Liang, Xiaohong Li, Jufeng Cao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xue ZhangCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Lanfang BaiCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Na ZhaoBio-Agriculture Institute of Shaanxi, Xi'an 710043, China.
Yongqiang WangCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Yu YaoCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Fugui WangCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Zhen WangCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Hongwei LiangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Xiaohong LiBayannur Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, Linhe, Bayannur 015400, China.
Jufeng CaoBayannur Academy of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, Linhe, Bayannur 015400, China.
Zhigang WangCollege of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.

Funding

Department of Education of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region BR251305Department of Science and Technology of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2025YFDZ0067Inner Mongolia Agricultural University NDYB2022-10National Natural Science Foundation of China 32460534People's Government of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2024JQ09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how different organic fertilization practices affect productivity, stability, and nitrogen use efficiency in the rotation systems of the Hetao Irrigation District. The research was based on a long-term field experiment (2015-2025), with a chemical fertilizer-only treatment as the control (CK). Four organic fertilization treatments were evaluated: farmyard manure application (CM), straw incorporation (CS), green manure cultivation and incorporation (CG), and a combined green manure plus straw treatment (CGS). Based on three consecutive years of observations (2023-2025), the impacts of these treatments on crop yield, yield composition and stability, plant nitrogen accumulation and allocation, and nitrogen use efficiency were systematically analyzed. Both CM and CS significantly increased maize equivalent yield (MEY) compared with the other treatments, by 33.68-66.04% and 16.05-24.21%, respectively. CM's productivity advantage was primarily driven by higher biomass accumulation, whereas CS's advantage was largely due to improvements in the harvest index. In terms of stability, CM exhibited the lowest coefficient of variation (CV), indicating the highest static stability, while CS showed a regression coefficient (

Indexed as

crop rotation systemcrop yieldnitrogen use efficiencyorganic fertilizationyield stability

Identifiers

PMID42122892
PMCPMC13165348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.