Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122827›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nanoparticle-Induced Cross-Tolerance: A Review of Mechanisms for Concurrent Biotic and Abiotic Stress Mitigation in Crops.

Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem, Iram Naz, Marissa Pérez-Alvarez, Jiandong Hu, Gregorio Cadenas-Pliego, Olaniyi Amos Fawole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mukhtar Iderawumi AbdulraheemPostharvest and Agroprocessing Research Centre, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6745-378X
Iram NazDepartment of Botany, The Government Sadiq College Women University, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0009-0324-5840
Marissa Pérez-AlvarezCentro de Investigación en Química Aplicada, Blvd. Enrique Reyna 140, Saltillo 25294, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1276-4230
Jiandong HuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Henan Agricultural University, Zhenghou 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1944-2840
Gregorio Cadenas-PliegoCentro de Investigación en Química Aplicada, Blvd. Enrique Reyna 140, Saltillo 25294, Coahuila, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-4995
Olaniyi Amos FawolePostharvest and Agroprocessing Research Centre, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants in agricultural systems rarely face single stressors; instead, they encounter concurrent biotic (pathogen, pests) and abiotic (drought, salinity, heavy metals) stresses that causes severely reduce crop yields and endanger food security. The traditional methods of breeding, genetic engineering, and agrochemicals tend to target individual stresses and still do not suffice in the complex field conditions. Compared to these approaches, nanotechnology offers distinct advantages: nanoparticles (NPs) can be applied as foliar sprays or seed treatments without lengthy breeding cycles or regulatory hurdles associated with genetically modified organisms. However, nanotechnology is not inherently "better" but rather complementary to crop engineering; each approach has specific strengths. Breeding and genetic engineering provide heritable, long-term solutions, while nanotechnology offers immediate, season-specific, and reversible interventions. Cross-tolerance, the phenomenon whereby exposure to one stress enhances tolerance to another, offers a promising alternative. This review critically examines how NPs act as stress-priming agents that induce cross-tolerance by activating overlapping defense networks, including antioxidant systems (SOD, CAT, APX), phytohormonal crosstalk (ABA, SA, JA), osmolyte homeostasis, and stress-responsive gene expression. We synthesize current evidence on NP uptake, translocation, and cellular interactions, and evaluate their dual role in directly suppressing pathogens while simultaneously enhancing plant immune responses and physiological resilience. However, efficacy is highly dose-dependent: low, subtoxic doses prime defense through hermetic ROS signaling, whereas supraoptimal doses cause phytotoxicity. The current challenges in nano-mediated stress alleviation include: (i) a persistent laboratory-to-field translation gap, with field outcomes averaging only 60-70% of greenhouse efficacy; (ii) dose-dependent phytotoxicity; (iii) poor reproducibility across studies; (iv) scalability and formulation stability issues; and (v) insufficient understanding of long-term environmental fate, including soil accumulation, non-target organism effects, and food chain safety. Future research should consider field-validated formulations (e.g., SiNPs, ZnONPs, Fe

Indexed as

antioxidant defensebiotic and abiotic stresscrop resiliencecross-tolerancenanoparticlesphytohormone signalingsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID42122827
PMCPMC13164773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.