Three Bacterial Endophytes Enhanced Plant Growth and Yield and Reduced the Severity of

Daniel Ambachew, Margaret T Mmbaga, Richard Hall, Peter Eyegheleme, Mustapha Olawuni, Jamille Robinson, Emily Rotich

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel AmbachewDepartment of Agriculture and Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.

Margaret T MmbagaDepartment of Agriculture and Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3998-1059

Richard HallDepartment of Agriculture and Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.

Peter EyeghelemeDepartment of Agriculture and Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.

Mustapha OlawuniDepartment of Agriculture and Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.

Jamille RobinsonDepartment of Agriculture and Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.

Emily RotichBiomedical Science, South College, Nashville, TN 37214, USA.

Funding

USDA NIFA GRant No This research was partly funded by the USDA-NIFA Grant award 367 no 2021-38821-34595

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturally abundant endophytes colonize plants internally without causing harm to their host plants. Endophytes are likely to occupy the same ecological niches as phytopathogens and thus have a high potential to be effective biological control agents. Their demonstrated ability to suppress more than one plant pathogen suggests that they can offer a viable alternative to chemical fungicides and a strategy for decreasing the inoculum potential of soil-borne pathogens. Some biocontrol endophytes are also known to improve soil health and the overall health of plants. However, the results in greenhouse studies do not always translate to consistent field efficacy. In this study, the efficacy of three endophytic bacterial isolates (PRT (

Indexed as

antagonistic associationbiological fungicidescrop yielddisease managementmutualistic associationplant defense

Identifiers

PMID42122794

DOI10.3390/plants15091301

PMCPMC13165220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.