ReviewPolymers2026
Selective Control Mechanisms, Quantitative Evaluation, and Sustainable Strategies for Cultural Heritage Surface Cleaning.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conservation of cultural heritage artifacts requires precise and controlled cleaning strategies to remove surface contaminants while preserving the structural and aesthetic integrity of the original materials. Over time, artifacts made of stone, paper, textiles, and other materials are exposed to environmental pollution, chemical reactions, and microbial colonization, which lead to the accumulation of complex contaminant layers and progressive material degradation. In recent years, significant advances in materials science have introduced innovative cleaning approaches, including polymer gels, microemulsions, nanomaterials, and enzyme-assisted systems, which enable selective contaminant removal with reduced risk of substrate damage. These methods provide improved control over solvent release, contaminant dissolution, and interaction with sensitive surfaces compared to conventional mechanical and chemical cleaning techniques. In addition, advanced analytical tools such as Raman spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) have enabled quantitative evaluation of cleaning efficiency and more accurate monitoring of conservation processes. This review summarizes the major contamination mechanisms affecting cultural heritage materials and discusses recent developments in cleaning technologies, functional materials, and evaluation methods. The analysis shows that selective cleaning methods can significantly minimize damage to the underlying substrate, while environmentally friendly functional materials combined with multi-dimensional quantitative evaluation provide an effective and sustainable framework for cultural heritage conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.