ArticlePolymers2026
Process and Structure Modeling of Architected Thermoplastic Composites Using Shape Forming Elements.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Architected polymer composites use spatially organized phases to achieve targeted property combinations. Shape forming elements (SFEs) are modular coextrusion die inserts that impose internal architectures by reshaping multiple melt streams. This study evaluates three SFE designs (Jacks, I-Beam, and Barn Door) that position a liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) and an amorphous polyamide (APA) in distinct core-shell configurations. Polymer clay prototyping and ANSYS Polyflow simulations were used to screen flow behavior, followed by extrusion at two puller speeds and characterization via optical microscopy and tensile testing. Microscopy revealed that abrupt area transitions and viscosity contrast disrupt encapsulation and distort designed features. Regression analysis showed that LCP content governs stiffness and strength, while higher puller speed enhances reinforcement through molecular orientation. Cross sectional geometries were quantified using interfacial perimeter, moments of inertia, and polar dispersion ratios, and correlated to tensile performance. Increased interfacial length reduced modulus, strength, and ductility. Modulus improved with LCP orientation and confinement, strength increased when LCP was placed at vertical extremities, and elongation was maximized by horizontally distributing LCP within a thick APA shell. These results demonstrate that SFEs enable tunable tradeoffs between stiffness, strength, and ductility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.