Evaluation of Coagulants and Polymers for Optimizing Wastewater Treatment and Acid Oil Extraction in a Poultry Processing Plant.

Elisa Tschaen Schneider, Polyana Silverio Massariol, Viviane Martins de Deus, Caio Lucas Alhadas de Paula Velloso, Job Teixeira de Oliveira

Abstract read

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisa Tschaen SchneiderDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of the Central East-Manguinhos, Serra 29173-087, ES, Brazil.

Polyana Silverio MassariolDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of the Central East-Manguinhos, Serra 29173-087, ES, Brazil.

Viviane Martins de DeusDepartment of Food Technology, Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil.

Caio Lucas Alhadas de Paula VellosoDepartment of Agricultural Engineering (DEA), Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.

Job Teixeira de OliveiraDepartment of Agronomy, Chapadão do Sul Campus (CPCS), UFMS-Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Chapadão do Sul 79560-000, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9046-0382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of oily wastewater represents a significant environmental challenge, requiring efficient separation technologies and waste valorization. This study evaluated different types of coagulants (ferric chloride 38% m/m, aluminum polychloride 18% m/m, aluminum sulfate 8% m/m, and ferrous sulfate 6% m/m) and anionic polymers (from six suppliers) for treating poultry slaughterhouse effluent, aiming to optimize both clarification and oil recovery from the floated sludge. Bench-scale jar tests (G = 300 s

Indexed as

dissolved air flotationfatty acid oilferric chlorideMonte Carlo simulationpolymerspoultry wastewaterprocess optimizationsustainability

Identifiers

PMID42122704

DOI10.3390/polym18091078

PMCPMC13165117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.