ArticlePolymers2026
Buckling and Post-Buckling Behaviour of a Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Stiffened Panel: A Numerical and Experimental Study.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The buckling and post-buckling responses of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) structures are strongly affected by geometric imperfections, boundary conditions, and material nonlinearities, making their reliable numerical prediction challenging. This work presents an integrated experimental-numerical investigation of a stiffened CFRP panel subjected to compressive loading, with the aim of improving model validation in instability regimes. The experimental campaign combines full-field measurements obtained through digital image correlation with local strain data from strain gauges, adopting a back-to-back configuration to capture the strain reversal associated with global buckling. The experimental results are compared with nonlinear finite element simulations incorporating intralaminar damage based on Hashin's failure criteria. A good agreement between the numerical and experimental results is observed in the pre-buckling and early post-buckling regimes. However, increasing discrepancies arise at higher load levels, mainly due to manufacturing imperfections and uncertainties in boundary conditions, which influence the onset and evolution of localized deformation. Statistical indicators are employed to quantitatively assess the correlation between the experimental and numerical responses. The analysis focuses on the key response parameters, including the load-displacement behaviour, out-of-plane displacements, strain evolution, and damage initiation, enabling a comprehensive comparison of experimental and numerical results. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining full-field and point-wise measurements for validating numerical models of composite structures. Furthermore, the study highlights the limitations of idealized modelling assumptions and provides insights into the sensitivity of CFRP structures to imperfections in post-buckling and failure regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.