ArticlePolymers2026
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Mechanical Recyclability Assessment of Different Types of PET Packaging Waste.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of plastic packaging waste needs to be optimized to improve recycling rates. In this article, fourteen categories of non-bottle polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packages were mechanically recycled at laboratory bench scale; the generated data were assessed using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to identify the categories most suited for the mechanical recycling process from social, technical and legislative viewpoints. Recycling yields varied between 75% and 92% across the 14 categories. The intrinsic viscosity (IV) values of the produced recycled PET (rPET) corresponded to molecular weights ranging from 28,000 to 35,000 g/mol. The MCDA recyclability assessment showed that 7 of the 14 categories (accounting for 72% of the sorted products by mass flow) are often composed of multiple, inseparable materials, resulting in the lowest-quality rPET. Furthermore, only 4 categories (approximately 28% of the categories) were found suitable for closed-loop mechanical recycling. The stakeholders involved in the PET packaging value chain could use these results to support decision-making and the development of a well-organized framework to valorize even the most complex types of plastic waste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.