ArticlePolymers2026
Multi-Objective AI Optimization of Plastic Waste Pyrolysis Integrating Energy Return on Investment for Circular Polymer Recycling.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rapid accumulation of plastic waste has created an urgent need for efficient and sustainable recycling technologies. Among various approaches, pyrolysis stands out as promising method of thermochemical recycling of plastic waste; however, the process needs optimization and further research to make it more energy-efficient and sustainable. The conventional approaches for optimization focus on the enhancement of yield, only overlooking efficiency and system-level sustainability. In this study, a machine learning-enabled surrogate-assisted multi-objective artificial intelligence (AI) optimization framework is developed for plastic pyrolysis to maximize product recovery and minimize energy consumption. The model integrates energy return on investment (EROI) and higher heating value (HHV) into process design. A curated dataset of 312 experimental cases covering polyolefins, PET, nylon, and mixed plastics was used to train multiple machine learning algorithms, such as polynomial regression, Gaussian process regression, and Random Forest models. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated superior predictive robustness across oil yield, HHV, char formation, and EROI. Pareto front analysis using NSGA-II revealed that moderate reaction severities (400-450 °C, 40-70 min) maximize net energy performance while minimizing solid residues. The conditional variational autoencoder as a GenAI model was incorporated to work as a generative proposal engine, which enhances the exploration of chemically feasible operating regions under uncertainty-aware active learning. The integration of techno-economic and life-cycle assessment demonstrates that energy-positive configurations outperform high-yield scenarios, achieving IRR > 15%, energy intensity < 10 MJ kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.