ReviewPolymers2026
The Use of 3D-Printed Polymer Components for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Dyes from Water: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water is one of the most valuable resources on the planet; without it, life as we know it could not exist. Consequently, its increasing scarcity and pollution, which are mainly due to industrialization and changing consumption patterns, intensify the stress on water resources. At the same time, industrial activities contribute to water contamination with pollutants such as heavy metals, further reducing water availability. Due to their risks to human health and ecosystems, effective removal strategies are essential. Among the emerging approaches, polymer-based additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing (3DP), has gained attention for water treatment due to its versatility, precise control over structure and porosity, and ease of processing, while remaining at a low cost. Additionally, the polymers used have interesting adsorbent properties and allow for the incorporation of functional additives, further enhancing their performance. This review analyses the recent advances in 3D-printed polymeric materials for the removal of heavy metals and dyes, focusing on material composition, manufacturing technologies, geometry, removal mechanisms, performance, and regeneration. It was concluded that metal ions and cationic dyes are primarily removed through adsorption, due to interactions with negatively charged surfaces that are often enhanced by high-affinity additives. Anionic dyes are generally less effectively removed by adsorption and often rely on degradation mechanisms. However, adsorption of anionic dyes can occur, for instance when the adsorbent surface is modified to introduce positively charged functional groups. The ability of 3DP to create hierarchical porous structures combining micro-, meso-, and macropores improves fluid flow and contact area, thereby enhancing the removal efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.