Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122647›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Recent Advances in Additively Manufactured Polymeric Structures for Mechanical Energy Absorption.

Alin Bustihan, Ioan Botiz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alin BustihanDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter and Advanced Technologies, Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioan BotizDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter and Advanced Technologies, Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8555-1084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has emerged as a powerful approach for producing architected materials with tailored mechanical properties and enhanced energy absorption capabilities. By enabling precise control over geometry, relative density, and hierarchical topology, additive manufacturing facilitates the design of lightweight cellular structures with superior crashworthiness compared to conventional energy-absorbing materials. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in additively manufactured energy-absorbing structures, with particular emphasis on the interplay between structural architecture, fabrication technologies, and mechanical performance. Key additive manufacturing processes, including fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, selective laser sintering, and multi-jet fusion, are evaluated in terms of their fabrication capabilities, material compatibility, and inherent limitations. Special attention is given to the mechanical behavior of representative architectures, including two-dimensional cellular structures, three-dimensional lattice geometries, sandwich systems, and emerging four-dimensional programmable materials. Depending on topology and material system, additively manufactured lattices can achieve specific energy absorption values exceeding 20-40 J g

Indexed as

3D-printed polymeric structuresadditive manufacturingenergy-absorbing applicationslattice structuresmechanical propertiesmetamaterials

Identifiers

PMID42122647
PMCPMC13164696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.